Peter Jenkins, Partner, Ernst & Young considers the implications of the Advocate-General's Opinion in the Arthur Andersen Case, and sets out why it is wrong and should not be followed by the ECJ
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Peter Jenkins, Partner, Ernst & Young considers the implications of the Advocate-General's Opinion in the Arthur Andersen Case, and sets out why it is wrong and should not be followed by the ECJ
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
