Where now asks Jolyon Maugham a barrister at 11 New Square following the Advocate-General's Opinion in Bond House
There are many branches of the legal profession that might find the Bond House saga an interesting subject for discussion. Jurists might advance it as one in the eye for legal positivism; historians as illustrating the old maxim that hard cases make bad law; the draftsman as evidence of the responsive nature of language. For their part the body of taxpayers might well applaud the money saved the Exchequer — unofficially estimated to exceed £1 billion — by a flawed rule of law. However the practitioner can but shake his head...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Where now asks Jolyon Maugham a barrister at 11 New Square following the Advocate-General's Opinion in Bond House
There are many branches of the legal profession that might find the Bond House saga an interesting subject for discussion. Jurists might advance it as one in the eye for legal positivism; historians as illustrating the old maxim that hard cases make bad law; the draftsman as evidence of the responsive nature of language. For their part the body of taxpayers might well applaud the money saved the Exchequer — unofficially estimated to exceed £1 billion — by a flawed rule of law. However the practitioner can but shake his head...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
