InGala 1 v HMRC[2016] UKUT 564 (3 January 2017) the UT confirmed that the right to a repayment under VATA 1994 s 80 in the context of a VAT group rests firmly with the representative member.
Gala appealed against HMRC’s rejection of its claims for repayment under VATA 1994 s 80. The claims related to supplies made by Gala (and other companies which had assigned their rights to Gala) whilst a member of various groups consecutively. On the basis of Taylor Clark [2016] CSIH 54 and MG Rover [2016] UKUT 434 Gala accepted that in the context of a group the right to claim repayment of overpaid VAT was the right of a single taxable person and that those rights were vested in the group’s representative member and not in the ‘real world supplier’ (RWS) save...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
InGala 1 v HMRC[2016] UKUT 564 (3 January 2017) the UT confirmed that the right to a repayment under VATA 1994 s 80 in the context of a VAT group rests firmly with the representative member.
Gala appealed against HMRC’s rejection of its claims for repayment under VATA 1994 s 80. The claims related to supplies made by Gala (and other companies which had assigned their rights to Gala) whilst a member of various groups consecutively. On the basis of Taylor Clark [2016] CSIH 54 and MG Rover [2016] UKUT 434 Gala accepted that in the context of a group the right to claim repayment of overpaid VAT was the right of a single taxable person and that those rights were vested in the group’s representative member and not in the ‘real world supplier’ (RWS) save...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
