Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

HMRC v Pinevale

In HMRC v Pinevale (FTC/92/2013 – 7 May 2014) the UT held that supplies of polycarbonate roof panels for conservatory roofs did not qualify for the reduced rate of VAT for energy saving materials.

Roof panels were used either as the entire roof of a conservatory or as part of it. Their purpose was to achieve much higher levels of insulation than would be achieved with conventional materials including double glazing.

The issue was therefore whether those panels fell within the scope of ‘installation of energy saving materials’ (VATA 1994 sch 7A group 2) in which case VAT would be chargeable on those products at the reduced rate of 5%. Note 1 to group 2 provides that ‘energy saving material’ includes insulation for roofs.

HMRC contended that the panels were not ‘insulation for roofs’ but rather the roof itself.

The FTT had held that HMRC was adopting...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top