In Hughes Property Partners Ltd v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 453 (TC) (25 May 2023) the FTT dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal against late filing penalties charged under FA 2009 Sch 55 for filing of an ATED return eight months late.
In August 2020 the taxpayer bought a property. As a property developer the taxpayer was entitled to an exemption from the annual tax on enveloped dwellings (ATED). The exemption had to be claimed in its ATED return which was due a month after the property purchase.
In August or September 2020 the taxpayer's agent telephoned HMRC for guidance because they had not previously encountered ATED. HMRC replied that they were working from home were very busy and were unable to give advice.
The agent could not recall if they had looked at the HMRC website. The ATED return was filed in May 2021...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Hughes Property Partners Ltd v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 453 (TC) (25 May 2023) the FTT dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal against late filing penalties charged under FA 2009 Sch 55 for filing of an ATED return eight months late.
In August 2020 the taxpayer bought a property. As a property developer the taxpayer was entitled to an exemption from the annual tax on enveloped dwellings (ATED). The exemption had to be claimed in its ATED return which was due a month after the property purchase.
In August or September 2020 the taxpayer's agent telephoned HMRC for guidance because they had not previously encountered ATED. HMRC replied that they were working from home were very busy and were unable to give advice.
The agent could not recall if they had looked at the HMRC website. The ATED return was filed in May 2021...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
