Can there be a game without interaction with other players?
InIFX Investment Company and Others v HMRC[2016] EWCA Civ 436 (4 May 2016) the Court of Appeal found that there could be a game even in the absence of interaction between players.
The issue was whether ‘Spot the Ball’ (STB) was a game of chance under the Gaming Act 1968 so that it was exempt from VAT under VATA 1994 Sch 9 Group 4.
The purpose of the game was to ‘use your skill and judgment to decide from all the information contained in the picture the spot where you think the centre of the ball is most likely to be and indicate the spot by making a cross’. HMRC contended that there was a requirement in law that a ‘game’ involved inter-player interaction; and since a competitor simply had to send in his...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Can there be a game without interaction with other players?
InIFX Investment Company and Others v HMRC[2016] EWCA Civ 436 (4 May 2016) the Court of Appeal found that there could be a game even in the absence of interaction between players.
The issue was whether ‘Spot the Ball’ (STB) was a game of chance under the Gaming Act 1968 so that it was exempt from VAT under VATA 1994 Sch 9 Group 4.
The purpose of the game was to ‘use your skill and judgment to decide from all the information contained in the picture the spot where you think the centre of the ball is most likely to be and indicate the spot by making a cross’. HMRC contended that there was a requirement in law that a ‘game’ involved inter-player interaction; and since a competitor simply had to send in his...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
