The tribunal has issued its decision in Ingenious Film Partners 2 LLP. Gideon Sanitt (Macfarlanes) reviews the consequences of that decision for investors.
‘… that which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet’ (Romeo and Juliet cited in the Ingenious Film Partners 2 case report at Chapter VI Section 4)
‘Not if you called ‘em Stenchblossoms’ (Bart Simpson)
On 2 August 2016 the First-tier Tribunal issued its decision inIngenious Games LLP Inside Track Productions LLP Ingenious Film Partners 2 LLP v HMRC (TC 2012/6581; 2013/118; 2013/122).
This case has had a contentious history including judicial reviews by Ingenious (R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc and another) v HMRC [2015] EWCA Civ 173) and possible accusations of dishonesty by...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The tribunal has issued its decision in Ingenious Film Partners 2 LLP. Gideon Sanitt (Macfarlanes) reviews the consequences of that decision for investors.
‘… that which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet’ (Romeo and Juliet cited in the Ingenious Film Partners 2 case report at Chapter VI Section 4)
‘Not if you called ‘em Stenchblossoms’ (Bart Simpson)
On 2 August 2016 the First-tier Tribunal issued its decision inIngenious Games LLP Inside Track Productions LLP Ingenious Film Partners 2 LLP v HMRC (TC 2012/6581; 2013/118; 2013/122).
This case has had a contentious history including judicial reviews by Ingenious (R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc and another) v HMRC [2015] EWCA Civ 173) and possible accusations of dishonesty by...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
