In Isle of Wight Council v HMRC (No. 4) (and related appeals) (TC02320 – 30 October) a district council had accounted for VAT on its receipts from car parks. It claimed a repayment on the basis that it should have treated these receipts as outside the scope of VAT by virtue of Article 4(5) of the EC Sixth Directive. Customs rejected the claim and the council appealed. The Ch D referred the case to the CJEU for a ruling on the interpretation of the phrase ‘significant distortions of competition’. The CJEU held ([2008] STC 2964) that Article 4(5) ‘is to be interpreted as meaning that the significant distortions of competition to which the treatment as non-taxable persons of bodies governed by private law acting as public authorities would lead must be evaluated by reference to the activity in question ...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Isle of Wight Council v HMRC (No. 4) (and related appeals) (TC02320 – 30 October) a district council had accounted for VAT on its receipts from car parks. It claimed a repayment on the basis that it should have treated these receipts as outside the scope of VAT by virtue of Article 4(5) of the EC Sixth Directive. Customs rejected the claim and the council appealed. The Ch D referred the case to the CJEU for a ruling on the interpretation of the phrase ‘significant distortions of competition’. The CJEU held ([2008] STC 2964) that Article 4(5) ‘is to be interpreted as meaning that the significant distortions of competition to which the treatment as non-taxable persons of bodies governed by private law acting as public authorities would lead must be evaluated by reference to the activity in question ...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
