Craig Connal QC reviews the impact of the recent Supreme Court decision on this issue
In two previous articles on judicial review of the Upper Tribunal (Tax Journals dated 19 April 2010 and 11 October 2010) I traced progress both in Scotland and England of debate about the place (if any) of judicial review in relation to the Upper Tribunal.
Tax Tribunals having been reformed and incorporated within an overall Tribunal structure practitioners need to understand the remedies which might be available.
Three cases were heard together by the Supreme Court Eba v Advocate General for Scotland ([2011] UKSC 29) from Scotland and both R (on the application of Cart) v The...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Craig Connal QC reviews the impact of the recent Supreme Court decision on this issue
In two previous articles on judicial review of the Upper Tribunal (Tax Journals dated 19 April 2010 and 11 October 2010) I traced progress both in Scotland and England of debate about the place (if any) of judicial review in relation to the Upper Tribunal.
Tax Tribunals having been reformed and incorporated within an overall Tribunal structure practitioners need to understand the remedies which might be available.
Three cases were heard together by the Supreme Court Eba v Advocate General for Scotland ([2011] UKSC 29) from Scotland and both R (on the application of Cart) v The...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: