In MJP Media Services Ltd v HMRC (Upper Tribunal – 2 September) a company (M) claimed a corporation tax deduction of £6 690 000 in relation to certain transactions with an associated company.
HMRC rejected the claim and M appealed contending that the debt arose from ‘transactions for the lending of money’ which constituted a ‘loan relationship’ within the definition in FA 1996 s 81 (see now CTA 2009 ss 302 303).
The First-tier Tribunal rejected this contention and dismissed the appeal observing that ‘in claiming a tax relief the burden of proof is on the appellant and the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities’.
The Tribunal noted that ‘the companies had apparently not retained copies of their bank statements’ and commented that ‘it is hard to understand why this basic...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In MJP Media Services Ltd v HMRC (Upper Tribunal – 2 September) a company (M) claimed a corporation tax deduction of £6 690 000 in relation to certain transactions with an associated company.
HMRC rejected the claim and M appealed contending that the debt arose from ‘transactions for the lending of money’ which constituted a ‘loan relationship’ within the definition in FA 1996 s 81 (see now CTA 2009 ss 302 303).
The First-tier Tribunal rejected this contention and dismissed the appeal observing that ‘in claiming a tax relief the burden of proof is on the appellant and the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities’.
The Tribunal noted that ‘the companies had apparently not retained copies of their bank statements’ and commented that ‘it is hard to understand why this basic...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
