In PB Golf Club Ltd (t/a Potters Bar Golf Club) v HMRC (TC02346 – 16 November) a company submitted a repayment claim following the CJEU decision in HMRC v Canterbury Hockey Club (CJEU Case C-253/07) on the grounds that it should have treated its green fees as exempt of VAT. HMRC rejected the claim. Following the First-tier Tribunal decision in HMRC v Bridport & West Dorset Golf Club Ltd (TC01214) the company applied to lodge a late appeal. HMRC opposed the application but the First-tier Tribunal granted it. Judge Radford observed that the Upper Tribunal had referred the Bridport & West Dorset Golf Club Ltd case to the CJEU so that ‘allowing this appeal out of time would cause no serious prejudice to HMRC’.
Why it matters: The substantive issues in this case are similar to those raised in the Bridport...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In PB Golf Club Ltd (t/a Potters Bar Golf Club) v HMRC (TC02346 – 16 November) a company submitted a repayment claim following the CJEU decision in HMRC v Canterbury Hockey Club (CJEU Case C-253/07) on the grounds that it should have treated its green fees as exempt of VAT. HMRC rejected the claim. Following the First-tier Tribunal decision in HMRC v Bridport & West Dorset Golf Club Ltd (TC01214) the company applied to lodge a late appeal. HMRC opposed the application but the First-tier Tribunal granted it. Judge Radford observed that the Upper Tribunal had referred the Bridport & West Dorset Golf Club Ltd case to the CJEU so that ‘allowing this appeal out of time would cause no serious prejudice to HMRC’.
Why it matters: The substantive issues in this case are similar to those raised in the Bridport...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
