Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

R (o.a.o Refinitiv Ltd and others) v HMRC

No inconsistency between DPT notices and terms of advance pricing agreement.

In R (o.a.o Refinitiv Ltd and others) v HMRC [2023] UKUT 257 (TCC) (20 October 2023) the UT dismissed the claimant companies’ judicial review claim finding that there was no inconsistency between diverted profits tax (DPT) notices issued by HMRC in respect of the 2018 accounting period (which included a charge to tax using a ‘profit-split’ arm’s length pricing for the relevant services) and the terms of an advance pricing agreement (APA) (which used a ‘cost-plus’ arm’s length pricing methodology in respect of the same services) whose contractual term had expired at the end of 2014.   

The claimant companies provided services (including services in respect of software new product and content development and data hosting) to a Swiss-based group entity which centrally held valuable intellectual property (IP) assets. The DPT notices charged the claimants to tax for the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top