In the first of three articles, Nigel Doran, partner in the corporate tax group at Macfarlanes, considers the development of the Ramsay principle since the seminal decision in BMBF/SPI
In the first of three articles Nigel Doran partner in the corporate tax group at Macfarlanes considers the development of the Ramsay principle since the seminal decision in BMBF/SPI
In the first of three articles on recent developments in the Ramsay principle I will be covering two post-BMBF/SPI cases in which the proper construction of legislation exploited for tax avoidance purposes was the central issue and a case in which a legalistic construction of the relevant legislation was held to exclude a Ramsay approach to the facts.
Introduction
...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In the first of three articles, Nigel Doran, partner in the corporate tax group at Macfarlanes, considers the development of the Ramsay principle since the seminal decision in BMBF/SPI
In the first of three articles Nigel Doran partner in the corporate tax group at Macfarlanes considers the development of the Ramsay principle since the seminal decision in BMBF/SPI
In the first of three articles on recent developments in the Ramsay principle I will be covering two post-BMBF/SPI cases in which the proper construction of legislation exploited for tax avoidance purposes was the central issue and a case in which a legalistic construction of the relevant legislation was held to exclude a Ramsay approach to the facts.
Introduction
...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
