In Impact Contracting Solutions Ltd v HMRC [2023] UKUT 215 (TCC) the appellant (Impact Contracting Solutions Ltd) operated in the labour supply market. It contracted with mini-umbrella companies (MUCs) for the supply of labour and supplying that labour on to its customers which were temporary work agencies. A question arose as to the nature of the supplies it was both being supplied with and supplying to its customers. HMRC considered that the appellant was registered for VAT principally or solely to abuse the VAT system by facilitating VAT fraud and that it knew or should have known of that facts. Consequently HMRC deregistered the appellant from the VAT system....
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Impact Contracting Solutions Ltd v HMRC [2023] UKUT 215 (TCC) the appellant (Impact Contracting Solutions Ltd) operated in the labour supply market. It contracted with mini-umbrella companies (MUCs) for the supply of labour and supplying that labour on to its customers which were temporary work agencies. A question arose as to the nature of the supplies it was both being supplied with and supplying to its customers. HMRC considered that the appellant was registered for VAT principally or solely to abuse the VAT system by facilitating VAT fraud and that it knew or should have known of that facts. Consequently HMRC deregistered the appellant from the VAT system....
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: