Dalla Jenney and Chris Bates of Norton Rose LLP reply to Bill Dodwell's observations on Tower MCashback
Dalla Jenney and Chris Bates of Norton Rose LLP reply to Bill Dodwell's observations on Tower MCashback
On the previous page of this issue there is an article by Bill Dodwell which was written as a follow-up to our article on the decision of Henderson J in Tower MCashback LLP and another v HMRC[2008] EWHC 2387 (Ch) (see The Tax Journal Issue 953 20 October 2008). We are most grateful to The Tax Journal for allowing us to read his article prior to its publication so both his response and our reply could be published in the same issue.
On first reading Howard Nowlan's decision it seemed...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Dalla Jenney and Chris Bates of Norton Rose LLP reply to Bill Dodwell's observations on Tower MCashback
Dalla Jenney and Chris Bates of Norton Rose LLP reply to Bill Dodwell's observations on Tower MCashback
On the previous page of this issue there is an article by Bill Dodwell which was written as a follow-up to our article on the decision of Henderson J in Tower MCashback LLP and another v HMRC[2008] EWHC 2387 (Ch) (see The Tax Journal Issue 953 20 October 2008). We are most grateful to The Tax Journal for allowing us to read his article prior to its publication so both his response and our reply could be published in the same issue.
On first reading Howard Nowlan's decision it seemed...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
