What happened at the OECD’s recent consultation on transfer pricing
Richard Collier and Aamer Rafiq, PwC
On 12 and 13 November the OECD held a consultation on transfer pricing. Broadcast online and open to members of the public it was attended by country tax authority delegates to the OECD Working Party No. 6 as well as representatives from interested business professional civil society and media groups globally ...
Intangibles
Further work needs to be done on the definition of intangibles. Specifically many delegates felt that intangibles should be limited to assets which are proprietary in nature i.e. with reference to rights which are protected by law or contract. The majority view was that goodwill should be taken into account when determining the arm’s length price of a business transfer but should not be considered an intangible in its own right. A large consensus of delegates agreed that the term ‘marketing intangibles’ is...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
Home >Articles > What happened at the OECD’s recent consultation on transfer pricing
What happened at the OECD’s recent consultation on transfer pricing
Richard Collier and Aamer Rafiq, PwC
On 12 and 13 November the OECD held a consultation on transfer pricing. Broadcast online and open to members of the public it was attended by country tax authority delegates to the OECD Working Party No. 6 as well as representatives from interested business professional civil society and media groups globally ...
Intangibles
Further work needs to be done on the definition of intangibles. Specifically many delegates felt that intangibles should be limited to assets which are proprietary in nature i.e. with reference to rights which are protected by law or contract. The majority view was that goodwill should be taken into account when determining the arm’s length price of a business transfer but should not be considered an intangible in its own right. A large consensus of delegates agreed that the term ‘marketing intangibles’ is...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
