Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Murphy v HMRC
Home
Murphy v HMRC
MURPHY-V-HMRC
Employment tax: the period that earnings are ‘for’
Nigel Doran
A recent tribunal decision on the taxation of a retention payment is a retrograde step, writes Nigel Doran (Macfarlanes).
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
1 /7
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
2 /7
Lost the battle but winning the war? The Supreme Court’s decision in PGMOL
Georgia Hicks
3 /7
Freebies
David Whiscombe
4 /7
Time is tight: CGT and the Autumn Budget
Peter Rayney
5 /7
What does the future hold for US adoption of the OECD’s two-pillar proposals?
Donald L. Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
6 /7
The emergence of a ‘new’ fixed establishment threshold for VAT grouping: insights from Barclays
Philippe Gamito
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
Lost the battle but winning the war? The Supreme Court’s decision in PGMOL
Georgia Hicks
Freebies
David Whiscombe
Time is tight: CGT and the Autumn Budget
Peter Rayney
What does the future hold for US adoption of the OECD’s two-pillar proposals?
Donald L. Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
The emergence of a ‘new’ fixed establishment threshold for VAT grouping: insights from Barclays
Philippe Gamito
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 22 November 2024
Tax increases in Scotland could have led to falling revenue, says IFS
NICs Bill published
Making Tax Digital: late-payment penalty anomaly corrected
Energy security investment mechanism: average prices
CASES
Read all
R (oao Refinitiv Ltd and others) v HMRC
Generator Power Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 22 November 2024
Syngenta Holdings Ltd v HMRC
The Executors of K Beresford v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Self’s assessment: Reforms to APR
Greater taxpayer success under internal HMRC reviews
Can a compromise on APR be achieved?
Autumn Budget 2024: IHT winners and losers
Corporate redomiciliation
MOST READ
Read all
Syngenta Holdings Ltd v HMRC
Finance Bill 2025 published
Autumn Budget 2024: IHT winners and losers
R (oao Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust) v HMRC
Apprenticeship Levy and Employment Allowance: new employer guidelines