Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Murphy v HMRC
Home
Murphy v HMRC
MURPHY-V-HMRC
Employment tax: the period that earnings are ‘for’
Nigel Doran
A recent tribunal decision on the taxation of a retention payment is a retrograde step, writes Nigel Doran (Macfarlanes).
EDITOR'S PICK
Cards face up? HMRC’s approach to the duty of candour
Robert Waterson
,
Rebekka Sandwell
1 /7
Self’s assessment: Reforms to APR
Heather Self
2 /7
The new Overseas Workday Relief regime: worse than before?
Steve Wade
3 /7
A new chapter in the unallowable purpose tale: the FTT’s decision in Syngenta
Tanja Velling
4 /7
Non-doms post-Budget: where are we now?
Helen McGhee
,
Lynnette Bober
5 /7
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
6 /7
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
7 /7
Cards face up? HMRC’s approach to the duty of candour
Robert Waterson
,
Rebekka Sandwell
Self’s assessment: Reforms to APR
Heather Self
The new Overseas Workday Relief regime: worse than before?
Steve Wade
A new chapter in the unallowable purpose tale: the FTT’s decision in Syngenta
Tanja Velling
Non-doms post-Budget: where are we now?
Helen McGhee
,
Lynnette Bober
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 13 December 2024
Scottish and Welsh Budget announcements
Lineker case settled
Anglesey Freeport: special tax sites designated
New overlap relief calculator
CASES
Read all
C Hoyle and others v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 13 December 2024
Five key cases of 2024
Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC
R Grint v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
A tale of two businesses
Pension ‘megafund’ reforms: how does tax fit in?
VAT on livestream events
Time for a replacement wealth tax?
Refinitiv: not so clear cut
MOST READ
Read all
Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 13 December 2024
L v HMRC
A third route to exit: tax consequences of continuation fund transactions
Consultation tracker