Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Mutuality of obligation
Home
Mutuality of obligation
MUTUALITY-OF-OBLIGATION
Lost the battle but winning the war? The Supreme Court’s decision in PGMOL
Georgia Hicks
Georgia Hicks (Devereux Chambers) unpacks the Supreme Court decision,
considers the state of the employment status test, and gives guidance
for taxpayers.
The Court of Appeal’s guidance on IR35 employment status
Georgia Hicks
Georgia Hicks (Devereux Chambers) examines two cases which seek to give authoritative guidance on the application of the
Ready Mixed Concrete
and business on own account tests.
The Court of Appeal’s ruling in PGMOL: seven lessons on mutuality of obligation
Jonathan Peacock QC
Georgia Hicks
As the dispute between PGMOL and HMRC goes back to round one, counsel for the taxpayer, Georgia Hicks (Devereux Chambers) and
Jonathan Peacock QC (11 New Square), consider what the Court of Appeal judgment means for taxpayers in the employment status debate.
Professional Game Match Officials: HMRC wins appeal but court orders a replay
Rebecca Seeley Harris
What can be gleaned from the Court of Appeal's recent judgment?
IR35 changes imminent: what do they mean?
Rebecca Wallis
Stephen Pevsner
Stephen Pevsner and Rebecca Wallis (Proskauer Rose) address the practical
issues surrounding compliance with the off-payroll working rules for private
sector clients due to be introduced from 6 April.
HMRC v Kickabout Productions Ltd
Mutuality of obligation crucial in UT’s reversal of FTT’s IR35 decision.
IR35: why (and when) mutuality of obligation matters
Derek Francis
Contrary to HMRC’s guidance and CEST tool, mutuality of obligation is pivotal to determining employment status in surprising ways. Derek Francis (Terra Firma Chambers) examines cases showing how.
Professional Game Match Officials: clarity on mutuality of obligation
Mark Groom
A recent Upper Tribunal decision provides three guiding principles on mutuality of obligation, writes Mark Groom (Deloitte).
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
1 /7
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
2 /7
Lost the battle but winning the war? The Supreme Court’s decision in PGMOL
Georgia Hicks
3 /7
Freebies
David Whiscombe
4 /7
Time is tight: CGT and the Autumn Budget
Peter Rayney
5 /7
What does the future hold for US adoption of the OECD’s two-pillar proposals?
Donald L. Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
6 /7
The emergence of a ‘new’ fixed establishment threshold for VAT grouping: insights from Barclays
Philippe Gamito
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
Lost the battle but winning the war? The Supreme Court’s decision in PGMOL
Georgia Hicks
Freebies
David Whiscombe
Time is tight: CGT and the Autumn Budget
Peter Rayney
What does the future hold for US adoption of the OECD’s two-pillar proposals?
Donald L. Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
The emergence of a ‘new’ fixed establishment threshold for VAT grouping: insights from Barclays
Philippe Gamito
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 1 November 2024
Chancellor targets businesses with CGT and IHT reforms
Spotlight on LLPs and disguised remuneration arrangements
New HMRC guidance for taxpayers on rental income
Land transaction tax in Wales: relief for special tax sites
CASES
Read all
GCH Corporation Ltd and others v HMRC
Abbeyford Caravan Company (Scotland) Ltd v HMRC
S Lefort v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 1 November 2024
R (oao Rettig Heating Group UK Ltd (in liquidation)) v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Autumn Budget 2024: a tax hike with familiar terrain
Autumn Budget 2024: tax on corporates
Autumn Budget 2024: private equity reforms - a mixed bag
Autumn Budget 2024: non-doms - the end of an era
Autumn Budget 2024: nothing too scary about CGT
MOST READ
Read all
‘Arrangements’ that disqualify new EMI option grants
A tale from the frontline of SDLT
Pillar Two and funds: there is no panacea
One minute with... Paul Rosser
Government to consult on new corporate re-domiciliation regime