Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Pillar one
Home
Pillar one
PILLAR-ONE
The three Ps of pillar one
Mark Bevington
Mark Bevington (ADE Tax) discusses the policy, politics and practicalities of
the pillar one proposals.
Tax and the City review for July 2020
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May) provide your monthly update on tax developments affecting the City.
Pillar one: what’s next?
Eloise Walker
It now looks certain that the OECD is aiming not only to reallocate taxing rights but also to increase the tax take, writes Eloise Walker (Pinsent Masons).
The OECD’s update on international tax reform
Zoe Andrews
One step forward?
Digital taxation: a bluffer’s guide
Eloise Walker
A basic primer on ‘the taxation of the digital economy’, the story so far, and what ‘pillar 1’ and ‘pillar 2’ mean - by Eloise Walker (Pinsent Masons).
International review for January 2020
Tim Sarson
Tim Sarson (KPMG) assesses the latest developments that matter in the international tax arena.
2019 review: taxing times for corporates
Ashley Greenbank
Even without a Budget, 2019 has been a year of significant change to the taxation of corporates, writes Ashley Greenbank (Macfarlanes).
Is the arm’s length principle dead?
Gary Richards
Robert Hartley
Gary Richards and Robert Hartley (Mishcon de Reya) focus on how OECD’s public consultation document on the ‘unified approach’ under pillar one sheds light on the future scope of the arm’s length principle.
Unify and conquer: the OECD’s ‘unified approach’ to pillar one
Brin Rajathurai
Murray Clayson
Brin Rajathurai and Murray Clayson (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) examine the proposals on ‘pillar one’ of an international solution to the taxation of multinational enterprises in the digital economy by 2020.
The OECD’s new approach to pillar one: the view from BIAC
William Morris
BIAC does not for a moment underestimate the difficulty of reaching a broad and deep agreement on pillar one.
Go to page
of
4
EDITOR'S PICK
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
1 /7
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
2 /7
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
3 /7
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
4 /7
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
5 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
6 /7
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
7 /7
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
NEWS
Read all
Urgent action could be required on non-dom ‘double remittances’
HMRC set out Pillar Two territories
Additional information requirements for creative industry claims updated
Private schools VAT challenge
HMRC increase late-payment interest rates
CASES
Read all
St Patrick’s International College Ltd and others v HMRC
Morgan Lloyd Trustees Ltd v HMRC
HMRC v Bolt Services UK Ltd
Other cases that caught our eye: 4 April 2025
HMRC v Innovative Bites Ltd and another
IN BRIEF
Read all
Excluded property trusts and 6 April 2025
IR35, staffing companies and the small company threshold
Country-by-country reporting goes public
When is 20% not 20%?
Are multiple trusts still a viable IHT planning strategy?
MOST READ
Read all
Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Ltd and others v HMRC
Concerns remain over Making Tax Digital
HMRC closing in on tax avoidance (again)
V Louwman v HMRC
B Lynch v HMRC