The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in Ardmore Construction v HMRC, holding that whether or not a payment has a UK source is a question of fact and that the Upper Tribunal’s decision was not one which could be overturned on Edwards v Bairstow principles. In doing so, an opportunity has been missed to clarify this difficult area of the law. There are a number of comments made in the judgment which temptingly hint at general principles that have a wider application. However, there is a danger of taking them out of context. For now, HMRC’s guidance remains the best place to start when considering source.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in Ardmore Construction v HMRC, holding that whether or not a payment has a UK source is a question of fact and that the Upper Tribunal’s decision was not one which could be overturned on Edwards v Bairstow principles. In doing so, an opportunity has been missed to clarify this difficult area of the law. There are a number of comments made in the judgment which temptingly hint at general principles that have a wider application. However, there is a danger of taking them out of context. For now, HMRC’s guidance remains the best place to start when considering source.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: