Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Cross border
Home
Cross border
CROSS BORDER
Tax and the private capital sector in 2026: three key issues
Elena Rowlands
Ian Zeider
Tom Margesson
Elena Rowlands, Tom Margesson and Ian Zeider (Travers Smith) take stock
of current developments.
From adversaries to agreement: can ADR unlock tax disputes around the world?
Liesl Fichardt
Emily Au
For cross-border disputes, there remains untapped potential for ADR to
resolve the waiting lists of cases in need of resolution, write Liesl Fichardt and
Emily Au (Quinn Emanuel).
Tax and the City review for March 2025
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
This month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May)
covers the decisions in
Lloyds Asset Leasing
and
Royal Bank of Canada
, as well
as HMRC’s plans to update guidance on the salaried member rules.
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
Gerald Montagu (Gide Loyrette Nouel) examines the First-tier Tribunal
decision in
Lloyds Asset Leasing Ltd
.
Towards a common European withholding framework
David Wren
Reinhart Devisscher
Paul Radcliffe
Paul Radcliffe, David Wren and Reinhart Devisscher (EY) consider the next steps for the EU to develop this model, and some key areas which may need to be contemplated in light of the European Commission’s upcoming consultation.
EU freedoms in cross-border transactions
Dominic Stuttaford
Greg Branagan
Two recent decisions have sought to clarify the extent to which the EU freedom of establishment and of the movement of capital were restricted in light of various UK legislative provisions dealing with cross-border transactions and/or operations, as Dominic Stuttaford and Greg Branagan (Norton Rose Fulbright) explain.
DAC 6 update: UK narrows scope of mandatory reporting
Sandy Bhogal
Avi Kaye
Sandy Bhogal and Avi Kaye (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher) explain the extent to which the UK government has curtailed existing reporting obligations.
Cross-border remote workers: PAYE issues
Steve Wade
Sarah Hewson
Sarah Hewson and Steve Wade (EY) examine PAYE obligations and how any UK employment tax risks can be mitigated.
How to choose your holding company location
Charles Osborne
Sara Luder
Sara Luder and Charles Osborne (Slaughter and May) examine the tax issues when choosing the location of a holding company.
The FTT’s recent approach to transfers of assets abroad
Rory Mullan
Rory Mullan (
Old Square Tax Chambers) examines two
cases that demonstrate the importance of establishing the
fundamental requirements of the TOAA code before a
charge can be imposed.
Go to page
of
36
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 6 February 2026
Finance Bill measures risk uncertainty, complexity and unintended effects, CIOT warns
Finance Bill round-up
Net settlement and annual reporting requirements
Companies now required to maintain own register of members
CASES
Read all
FS Commercial Ltd v HMRC
P Kearney v HMRC
Mark Glenn Ltd v HMRC
J Hall v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 6 February 2026
IN BRIEF
Read all
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
Revenue fraud
The new share for share anti-avoidance
Value on death: IHT
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
MOST READ
Read all
M Holden v HMRC and HMRC v The Boston Consulting Group UK LLP and others
COP 9 and serious tax fraud: HMRC’s tougher approach
One minute with... Hayley Ives
Consultation tracker
Nimbus: The Disability Consultancy Service Ltd v HMRC