A selection of Tax Journal commentaries on the European Commission's investigations into alleged fiscal state aid.
The European Commission’s recent investigations into alleged fiscal state aid represent a new front on tackling perceived corporate tax avoidance.
The sums at stake are huge – ranging from €20-30m into investigations into rulings by Luxembourg and the Netherlands up to €13 billion for Ireland’s taxation of Apple.
Investigations into Belgian ‘excess profits’ rules and now aspects of the UK’s CFC regime show that the Commission is willing to challenge not only individual rulings, but also member states’ tax regimes.
For some, this is a much needed move to ensure the fair taxation of multinationals. For others, it is a blunt tool which misunderstands existing case law, and unfairly undermines member states’ taxing rights.
For more details, see recent Tax Journal commentaries including:
Why the EC regards the UK's CFC group exemption rules as state aid - by Katherine Blatchford & Simon Whithead (Joseph Hage Aaronson) And see the review of the earlier EC announcement on this issue - by David Harkness, Dan Neidle and Rob Sharpe (Clifford Chance).
Ten questions on the Apple state aid decision - by Dominic Robertson and Isabel Taylor (Slaughter and May), plus an Irish perspective on the Apple ruling - by Aisling Donohue (mgpartners).
Why the Commission's general approach is highly questionable – by state aid expert Conor Quigley QC (Serle Court).
20 questions on fiscal state aid and tax - Jonathan Hare, Stephen Morse (PwC) and Peter Halford (PwC Legal) provide an overview of the rules.
The US view: has the EC overeached? - by Michael Lebovitz (White & Case).
A selection of Tax Journal commentaries on the European Commission's investigations into alleged fiscal state aid.
The European Commission’s recent investigations into alleged fiscal state aid represent a new front on tackling perceived corporate tax avoidance.
The sums at stake are huge – ranging from €20-30m into investigations into rulings by Luxembourg and the Netherlands up to €13 billion for Ireland’s taxation of Apple.
Investigations into Belgian ‘excess profits’ rules and now aspects of the UK’s CFC regime show that the Commission is willing to challenge not only individual rulings, but also member states’ tax regimes.
For some, this is a much needed move to ensure the fair taxation of multinationals. For others, it is a blunt tool which misunderstands existing case law, and unfairly undermines member states’ taxing rights.
For more details, see recent Tax Journal commentaries including:
Why the EC regards the UK's CFC group exemption rules as state aid - by Katherine Blatchford & Simon Whithead (Joseph Hage Aaronson) And see the review of the earlier EC announcement on this issue - by David Harkness, Dan Neidle and Rob Sharpe (Clifford Chance).
Ten questions on the Apple state aid decision - by Dominic Robertson and Isabel Taylor (Slaughter and May), plus an Irish perspective on the Apple ruling - by Aisling Donohue (mgpartners).
Why the Commission's general approach is highly questionable – by state aid expert Conor Quigley QC (Serle Court).
20 questions on fiscal state aid and tax - Jonathan Hare, Stephen Morse (PwC) and Peter Halford (PwC Legal) provide an overview of the rules.
The US view: has the EC overeached? - by Michael Lebovitz (White & Case).