The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (oao Aozora GMAC Investment Ltd) v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 1643 alights on the complex terrain of when HMRC is able to resile from its guidance and indeed what the taxpayer needs to demonstrate in order to make good its claim that its ‘legitimate expectation’ has been unlawfully breached.
The background to the case
A UK resident subject to UK tax on income or gains attracting foreign tax may claim unilateral relief from double taxation. At the relevant time this was achieved through a claim under ICTA 1988 s 790. Section 793A(3) of ICTA 1988 restricted the availability of relief under s 790 if a...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (oao Aozora GMAC Investment Ltd) v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 1643 alights on the complex terrain of when HMRC is able to resile from its guidance and indeed what the taxpayer needs to demonstrate in order to make good its claim that its ‘legitimate expectation’ has been unlawfully breached.
The background to the case
A UK resident subject to UK tax on income or gains attracting foreign tax may claim unilateral relief from double taxation. At the relevant time this was achieved through a claim under ICTA 1988 s 790. Section 793A(3) of ICTA 1988 restricted the availability of relief under s 790 if a...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: