Judicial review (JR) applications allow for an important check on HMRC’s exercise of powers and provide an avenue of redress to a taxpayer where HMRC is found to have acted illegally irrationally in breach of procedural fairness or in breach of a legitimate expectation. However the grounds of JR have repeatedly been described in cases as involving ‘high bars’ to overcome and this has played out in a series of recent decisions dismissing taxpayers’ JR claims.
Here we consider the recent High Court judgment in R(on the application of Realreed Ltd) v HMRC [2023] EWHC 1572 (Admin) (‘Realreed’) where the court considered whether HMRC’s failure to spot errors in a taxpayer’s VAT accounting treatment of its supplies during inspection visits could lead to a breach of the taxpayer’s legitimate expectation...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Judicial review (JR) applications allow for an important check on HMRC’s exercise of powers and provide an avenue of redress to a taxpayer where HMRC is found to have acted illegally irrationally in breach of procedural fairness or in breach of a legitimate expectation. However the grounds of JR have repeatedly been described in cases as involving ‘high bars’ to overcome and this has played out in a series of recent decisions dismissing taxpayers’ JR claims.
Here we consider the recent High Court judgment in R(on the application of Realreed Ltd) v HMRC [2023] EWHC 1572 (Admin) (‘Realreed’) where the court considered whether HMRC’s failure to spot errors in a taxpayer’s VAT accounting treatment of its supplies during inspection visits could lead to a breach of the taxpayer’s legitimate expectation...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: