Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Atlantic Electronics Ltd v HMRC (No. 4)

Admissible evidence

In Atlantic Electronics Ltd v HMRC (No. 4) (Upper Tribunal – 30 November) a company had reclaimed input tax of more than £1 000 000 on the purchase of a large number of mobile telephones. HMRC rejected the claim on the basis that the transactions formed part of an MTIC fraud and the company appealed. HMRC applied for several witness statements to be admitted in evidence. The company objected to some of the statements. The First-tier Tribunal directed that statements by two of HMRC’s witnesses should be excluded. HMRC appealed to the Upper Tribunal which upheld the First-tier decision in respect of one of the witnesses. Judge Bishopp observed that ‘this was evidence HMRC wished to put in after the expiry of the time limit imposed by tribunal directions already extended several times and when they knew that an application for permission would...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top