Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

AXA SA v Genworth Financial International Holdings LLC and others

High Court decides ‘subject to tax’ in SPA gross-up clause means actual tax due.

The dispute in AXA SA v Genworth Financial International Holdings LLC and others [2020] EWHC 2024 (Comm) (27 July) concerned a fairly standard clause providing for a gross-up for tax in hand in respect of a payment made under a share purchase agreement (SPA) (in this case a payment from the seller to indemnify the buyer for 90% of any liabilities relating to the mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI) by the acquired companies). The High Court held that the words ‘subject to taxation in the hands of the receiving party’ in that clause means ‘actually taxed in the hands of the receiving party’.

The court also held that the additional payment to gross up for the tax in hand only becomes due when the receiving party is under an enforceable obligation to pay an...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top