Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

B Macey v HMRC

In B Macey v HMRC (TC00787 – 18 November) an accountant (M) agreed to take up employment with a merchant bank in 2001. He received some ‘restricted stock units’ which he subsequently (in 2006/07) converted into common stock. HMRC issued an amendment to his 2006/07 tax return to charge income tax on the value of the stock. M appealed. The First-Tier Tribunal dismissed his appeal applying the principles laid down by the HL in Shilton v Wilmshurst [1991] STC 88 and holding that the restricted stock was an inducement to enter into a contract of employment which was taxable on its conversion as an emolument of that employment within ITEPA 2003 s 62(2).

Why it matters: The First-Tier Tribunal upheld HMRC’s interpretation of the well-known case of Shilton v Wilmshurst. The payment here was an inducement to the accountant to enter into a contract...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top