In our article ‘Basis period reform: a simplification with complications’ (Tax Journal, 10 September 2021), we summarised the government’s proposals to change income tax basis periods for the taxation of business profits from the current year basis to a tax year basis. We highlighted some complications and practical and commercial issues that businesses will face.
Subsequently, on publication of Finance Bill 2021/22 on 4 November 2021, a number of changes were announced that are designed to alleviate the worst impacts of the transitional rules. In particular:
The revised legislation also confirms a number of other amendments that will assist businesses:
HMRC has also committed to further engagement with stakeholders regarding other legislative and administrative easements that may be introduced to aid businesses that decide not to change their accounting date to 31 March/5 April and will, therefore, be required to make apportionments of taxable profits every year. This is expected to take place after the current Finance Bill receives royal assent, and current ideas include:
It now seems clear that the policy decision to separate out transitional profits in the tax calculation (see FB 2022 Sch 1 para 75) is intended to protect those on low and modest incomes from the unfair impact of the rules on means-tested benefits. It is also clear that there is no desire to remove all of the tax impacts of basis period change (for example, to preserve personal allowances for high earners), and that the legislation is intended to ensure that transitional profit should be taxed as ‘normally’ as possible without unfair consequences. However, HMRC has acknowledged that the current proposals will preserve pensions annual allowances in the years in which transitional profit falls. This change has created the need for particularly challenging calculations to be performed in order to determine the amount of tax due on transitional profits, but HMRC considers that third party software should be capable of dealing with this.
The mechanics of separating transitional profits from ‘normal’ profits in the tax calculation can be illustrated in the boxed example.
Other areas of concern that remain to be considered, particularly for large partnerships, include:
HMRC is clearly listening to constructive feedback on these reforms and making efforts to limit unfair and unintended consequences resulting from the transitional provisions. Whilst these transitional provisions are complex in themselves, incorporating mitigation steps in the new legislation, rather than changing the underlying income tax legislation for calculating tax on profits (ITA 2007 s 23 et al), does seem sensible. After all, the majority of sole traders and partnerships (by number) have a 31 March or 5 April year end, so will not have to calculate transitional profit anyway.
Businesses will need to monitor developments, including the further consultation to be launched by HMRC in spring 2022.
In our article ‘Basis period reform: a simplification with complications’ (Tax Journal, 10 September 2021), we summarised the government’s proposals to change income tax basis periods for the taxation of business profits from the current year basis to a tax year basis. We highlighted some complications and practical and commercial issues that businesses will face.
Subsequently, on publication of Finance Bill 2021/22 on 4 November 2021, a number of changes were announced that are designed to alleviate the worst impacts of the transitional rules. In particular:
The revised legislation also confirms a number of other amendments that will assist businesses:
HMRC has also committed to further engagement with stakeholders regarding other legislative and administrative easements that may be introduced to aid businesses that decide not to change their accounting date to 31 March/5 April and will, therefore, be required to make apportionments of taxable profits every year. This is expected to take place after the current Finance Bill receives royal assent, and current ideas include:
It now seems clear that the policy decision to separate out transitional profits in the tax calculation (see FB 2022 Sch 1 para 75) is intended to protect those on low and modest incomes from the unfair impact of the rules on means-tested benefits. It is also clear that there is no desire to remove all of the tax impacts of basis period change (for example, to preserve personal allowances for high earners), and that the legislation is intended to ensure that transitional profit should be taxed as ‘normally’ as possible without unfair consequences. However, HMRC has acknowledged that the current proposals will preserve pensions annual allowances in the years in which transitional profit falls. This change has created the need for particularly challenging calculations to be performed in order to determine the amount of tax due on transitional profits, but HMRC considers that third party software should be capable of dealing with this.
The mechanics of separating transitional profits from ‘normal’ profits in the tax calculation can be illustrated in the boxed example.
Other areas of concern that remain to be considered, particularly for large partnerships, include:
HMRC is clearly listening to constructive feedback on these reforms and making efforts to limit unfair and unintended consequences resulting from the transitional provisions. Whilst these transitional provisions are complex in themselves, incorporating mitigation steps in the new legislation, rather than changing the underlying income tax legislation for calculating tax on profits (ITA 2007 s 23 et al), does seem sensible. After all, the majority of sole traders and partnerships (by number) have a 31 March or 5 April year end, so will not have to calculate transitional profit anyway.
Businesses will need to monitor developments, including the further consultation to be launched by HMRC in spring 2022.