Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Burlington in the UT: a clearer approach

Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) explains that the Upper Tribunal has largely eschewed the FTT’s extensive reliance on UK domestic law cases on ‘purpose’ when determining whether a treaty anti-abuse provision applies.

UK tax has to be withheld from interest payments to Cayman-resident companies but if the UK/Irish treaty applies not from those to Irish-resident companies. A Cayman company looking down the barrel of an interest payment with UK withholding tax might therefore naturally seek to sell the debt to an Irish company; the two can set the price so as to split the benefit of the withholding tax saving. The question in HMRC v Burlington Loan Management DAC [2024] UKUT 152 (TCC) was whether doing so was enough to have a ‘main purpose of taking advantage’ of treaty benefits and therefore rescind them.

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held that this wasn’t enough as I reported in...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top