Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Burlington and treaty purpose tests

Kyle Rainsford (Norton Rose Fulbright) examines the first UK case about the interpretation of a purpose rule in a double tax treaty which extends the recent approach of Blackrock HoldCo 5 to the international fiscal arena.

Despite the proliferation of ‘purpose tests’ – which deny tax benefits where transactions were effected for proscribed objectives – the approach of HMRC and the judiciary to their interpretation is still not settled. Burlington Loan Management DAC v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 290 (TC) is the first UK case about the interpretation of a purpose rule in a double tax treaty and extends the recent approach of the judiciary in cases like HMRC v Blackrock HoldCo 5 LLC [2022] UKUT 199 (TCC) to the international fiscal arena.

Background

SAAD Investment Company Ltd (SICL) a Cayman company was owed £142m by Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE) which was in administration. That...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top