Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Comparing US and UK anti-avoidance approaches

The US has and the UK is considering enacting an anti-avoidance statute. Don Korb and Aditi Banerjee provide a comparison of both countries’ anti-avoidance case law which may be useful in understanding these rules

The US Congress recently codified what has been historically a judicially developed doctrine requiring a taxpayer to satisfy an ‘economic substance’ standard when determining whether the taxpayer is entitled to tax benefits from a particular transaction. The UK Government has also announced a proposed consultation on the possibility of introducing a statutory general anti-abuse rule for taxes.

These two events are a striking development; traditionally both countries have relied on the courts to appropriately interpret the statutory tax law in order to adjudicate the appropriate tax result. In light of these developments a brief comparative exploration of the US and UK judicial approaches to tax-avoidance transactions may be useful and the US experience...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top