Costs and access to justice before the Tribunals

Jason Collins

The Costs Review Group has recommended changes to ‘costs-shifting’ rules in the Tribunals in order to improve access to justice. Consideration of compulsory cost-sharing between taxpayers in class actions against HMRC was regrettably outside the scope of the Group's brief.

The Group's first key recommendation which affects tax is the removal of mandatory costs-shifting (ie the loser pays the winner's costs) in appeals to the Upper Tribunal. Instead it recommends:

that taxpayers should be able to opt out of costs-shifting before the Upper Tribunal where there was no possibility of costs-shifting below – ie cases allocated in the First-tier Tribunal as Default Paper Basic or Standard; and
...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Subscribe Now...

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.

Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

The Group's first key recommendation which affects tax is the removal of mandatory costs-shifting (ie the loser pays the winner's costs) in appeals to the Upper Tribunal. Instead it recommends:

that taxpayers should be able to opt out of costs-shifting before the Upper Tribunal where there was no possibility of costs-shifting below – ie cases allocated in the First-tier Tribunal as Default Paper Basic or Standard; and
...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: