Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

DA Perks v HMRC

In DA Perks v HMRC (TC01930 – 19 April) a plumber (P) registered for VAT in 2006 but subsequently failed to charge VAT on his supplies. When HMRC discovered this they imposed a penalty under FA 2007 Sch 24 at the rate of 20% of the potential lost revenue. P appealed contending that his turnover had fallen below the threshold and his accountant had told him that he did not need to charge VAT. The tribunal dismissed his appeal finding that P had been ‘appallingly let down’ by his accountant but that he had acted ‘without reasonable care’ and that the amount of the penalty was ‘fair and reasonable’.

Read more here.

Why it matters: The First-tier Tribunal accepted the appellant’s evidence that his accountant had told him that he did...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top