Ray McCann suggests that HMRC's attempt in Charlton to use TMA 1970 s 29 to correct its own error is in breach of its litigation strategy and is contrary to assurances given when the DOTAS regime was introduced.
HMRC’s attempt in Charlton to use TMA 1970 s 29 to correct its own error seems to be arguably in breach of its own litigation strategy and is contrary to assurances given in 2004 when DOTAS was introduced.
The decision of the Upper Tribunal in Charlton FTC/73/2011 was clear cut and changes little as to how the ‘discovery’ rules apply. Briefly summarised the taxpayers fully disclosed their tax scheme including crucially a scheme reference number (SRN). Despite this HMRC (fully aware of the scheme) overlooked the...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Ray McCann suggests that HMRC's attempt in Charlton to use TMA 1970 s 29 to correct its own error is in breach of its litigation strategy and is contrary to assurances given when the DOTAS regime was introduced.
HMRC’s attempt in Charlton to use TMA 1970 s 29 to correct its own error seems to be arguably in breach of its own litigation strategy and is contrary to assurances given in 2004 when DOTAS was introduced.
The decision of the Upper Tribunal in Charlton FTC/73/2011 was clear cut and changes little as to how the ‘discovery’ rules apply. Briefly summarised the taxpayers fully disclosed their tax scheme including crucially a scheme reference number (SRN). Despite this HMRC (fully aware of the scheme) overlooked the...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: