David Anderson, Associate at McGrigors, discusses the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Staatssecretaris van Financien v BF Joustra Case C-5/05
David Anderson Associate at McGrigors discusses the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Staatssecretaris van Financien v BF Joustra Case C-5/05
If the name of the case Staatssecretaris van Financien v BF Joustra does not mean anything to you it's the one which the media got very excited over (and doubtless the Treasury got very worried about) last week in the run-up to the release of the ECJ's decision last Thursday. The excitement was caused by the earlier Opinion of Advocate-General Jacobs who had held that excise goods purchased for personal use by private individuals could be delivered by a third party without incurring duty...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
David Anderson, Associate at McGrigors, discusses the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Staatssecretaris van Financien v BF Joustra Case C-5/05
David Anderson Associate at McGrigors discusses the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Staatssecretaris van Financien v BF Joustra Case C-5/05
If the name of the case Staatssecretaris van Financien v BF Joustra does not mean anything to you it's the one which the media got very excited over (and doubtless the Treasury got very worried about) last week in the run-up to the release of the ECJ's decision last Thursday. The excitement was caused by the earlier Opinion of Advocate-General Jacobs who had held that excise goods purchased for personal use by private individuals could be delivered by a third party without incurring duty...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
