Siobhan Mossop considers the taxpayer’s victory in the DV3 case concerning sub-sale SDLT arrangements
The taxpayer won in the recent Upper Tribunal case on SDLT avoidance concerning sub-sale arrangements. But similar planning arrangements may not work today given the anti-avoidance measures in FA 2003.
The Upper Tribunal has found in favour of the taxpayer in the most recent instalment of the DV3 litigation (see HMRC v DV3 RS Limited Partnership [2012] UKUT (399) (TCC)). The judgment was accompanied with a note of caution: the SDLT planning used by DV3 may have been successful in 2006 but in the words of the tribunal ‘would probably’ be impacted today by the anti-avoidance provisions introduced since (specifically FA 2003 ss 75A–75C).
Unless HMRC successfully appeals this decision it looks like HMRC will have to...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Siobhan Mossop considers the taxpayer’s victory in the DV3 case concerning sub-sale SDLT arrangements
The taxpayer won in the recent Upper Tribunal case on SDLT avoidance concerning sub-sale arrangements. But similar planning arrangements may not work today given the anti-avoidance measures in FA 2003.
The Upper Tribunal has found in favour of the taxpayer in the most recent instalment of the DV3 litigation (see HMRC v DV3 RS Limited Partnership [2012] UKUT (399) (TCC)). The judgment was accompanied with a note of caution: the SDLT planning used by DV3 may have been successful in 2006 but in the words of the tribunal ‘would probably’ be impacted today by the anti-avoidance provisions introduced since (specifically FA 2003 ss 75A–75C).
Unless HMRC successfully appeals this decision it looks like HMRC will have to...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: