In Gateshead Talmudical College v HMRC (TC00541 – 9 June) a college of religious education arranged for the construction of an extension to its premises. In September 1996 it registered for VAT describing its business as property letting’. In November 1996 it leased the extension to a company (S) which leased it back to the college.
Both S and the college opted to tax the property and the college claimed a repayment of VAT on the construction costs. HMRC made the repayment. From November 1996 to August 1998 S and the college accounted for output tax...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Gateshead Talmudical College v HMRC (TC00541 – 9 June) a college of religious education arranged for the construction of an extension to its premises. In September 1996 it registered for VAT describing its business as property letting’. In November 1996 it leased the extension to a company (S) which leased it back to the college.
Both S and the college opted to tax the property and the college claimed a repayment of VAT on the construction costs. HMRC made the repayment. From November 1996 to August 1998 S and the college accounted for output tax...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
