Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Go City: end of the road for ‘protective assessments’?

A recent FTT decision provides a startling level of insight into HMRC’s decision making process, writes Bryn Reynolds (Pinsent Masons).

Readers of the recent Go City Ltd v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 745 (TC) decision may have been expecting a technical discussion on the difference between a ticket and a voucher. Instead they received a front-row seat to an exploration of HMRC’s internal procedures inadequate disclosure and at one point reliance that their previous advice was incorrect that will make uncomfortable reading for HMRC. A loss on the technical grounds may be a blessing as it diverts attention from the nearly £4m potentially lost due to internal procedural delays.

Settled history?

HMRC and the Leisure Pass Group (‘Leisure Pass’) debated the VAT treatment of the eponymous pass over a series of hearings from 2007. Leisure Pass’ preferred treatment as a face value voucher not only provided a cash...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top