Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

GR Solutions Ltd v HMRC

In GR Solutions Ltd v HMRC (TC01928 – 12 April) a company director (H) purchased a BMW motor car in April 2004. In December 2004 he sold a 90% share in the car to the company (G). G paid for fuel but failed to account for Class 1A national insurance contributions. HMRC issued a ruling that G was required to pay Class 1A contributions in respect of the car and the fuel. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed G’s appeal. Judge Staker held that G had made the car available to H by virtue of his employment. Applying the principles laid down by Pumfrey J in Christensen v Vasili [2004] STC 935 the fact that H owned 10% of the car did not avoid the liability to national insurance contributions.

Read the decision here.

Why it...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top