Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Hicks, discovery assessments and careless advisers

A recent Upper Tribunal decision provides a useful refresher of the steps that can be taken to reduce the possibility of HMRC successfully making a discovery, writes Helen Adams (BDO).

Discovery continues to be an area in which the ‘devil is in the detail’ and case law developments tweak our understanding of the tests and their application to real cases. HMRC v Hicks [2020] UKUT 12 is the latest Upper Tribunal (UT) decision to explore discovery’s complexities. Whilst it was expected to clarify who is considered to ‘act on behalf of’ a taxpayer it sheds light on what agents should do to avoid being considered careless as well as how to test the adequacy of disclosures seeking to protect taxpayers against discovery.

All references to ‘section’ in the text below are references to sections in TMA 1970 unless otherwise stated.

The situation in Hicks

Mr...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top