Interim payment
The case of HMRC v GKN Group (CA – 31 January) follows on from the Ch D decision in Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HMRC (No 2) (subsequently referred to the CJEU as Case C-35/11). Following that decision a company applied for an interim payment. The Ch D awarded an interim payment of £1 977 623 and HMRC appealed to the CA which unanimously upheld the payment in principle but reduced it to £1 490 932.
Why it matters: The CA upheld the Ch D decision that the company was entitled to an interim payment but reduced the amount of the payment.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Interim payment
The case of HMRC v GKN Group (CA – 31 January) follows on from the Ch D decision in Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v HMRC (No 2) (subsequently referred to the CJEU as Case C-35/11). Following that decision a company applied for an interim payment. The Ch D awarded an interim payment of £1 977 623 and HMRC appealed to the CA which unanimously upheld the payment in principle but reduced it to £1 490 932.
Why it matters: The CA upheld the Ch D decision that the company was entitled to an interim payment but reduced the amount of the payment.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: