A recent High Court decision Hughes v HMRC and another [2024] EWHC 1765 (KB) demonstrates that it is almost impossible for a defendant acquitted of tax fraud to recover damages for malicious prosecution or misfeasance in a public office even when improper conduct has caused the taxpayer to suffer vast losses. However it is not HMRC’s success in resisting an action for damages that breaks new ground. In truth the outcome of Mr Hughes’s claim is uncontroversial. Rather it is insights into HMRC’s practices in the investigation of an allegedly complex tax fraud described in the court’s judgment which make for compelling reading.
The taxpayer Richard Hughes was a partner...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
A recent High Court decision Hughes v HMRC and another [2024] EWHC 1765 (KB) demonstrates that it is almost impossible for a defendant acquitted of tax fraud to recover damages for malicious prosecution or misfeasance in a public office even when improper conduct has caused the taxpayer to suffer vast losses. However it is not HMRC’s success in resisting an action for damages that breaks new ground. In truth the outcome of Mr Hughes’s claim is uncontroversial. Rather it is insights into HMRC’s practices in the investigation of an allegedly complex tax fraud described in the court’s judgment which make for compelling reading.
The taxpayer Richard Hughes was a partner...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: