Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Implications of the Advocate General’s opinion in Weald Leasing

Greg Sinfield on the implications of the Advocate General’s opinion in Weald Leasing

On Tuesday 26 October the Advocate General (Mazak) gave his opinion in HMRC v Weald Leasing (Case C-103/09). The case concerned an arrangement used by an insurance group Churchill to defer irrecoverable VAT on business assets by purchasing and leasing them through a subsidiary Weald Leasing and an unconnected third party Suas. The lease rentals were below open market value thus extending the period of deferral. The reason for inserting Suas into the structure was to prevent HMRC from being able to impose market value on the lease rentals under VATA 1994 Sch 6 para 1.

To the relief of many exempt businesses throughout the EU the Advocate General has recommended that the ECJ should hold that leasing to defer irrecoverable VAT is not by itself tax avoidance....

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top