Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Ismail G Essack v HMRC

Compensation payment under compromise agreement

In Ismail G Essack v HMRC (TC03297 – 7 February 2014) the issue was whether a payment made to an employee was taxable as a capital gain or as employment income.

Ignition (Mr Essack’s employer) was acquired by another company in 2007 and the shareholder agreement referred to an employee share option plan. In 2008 a senior manager of Ignition referred again to the company’s promise to issue shares to key employees.

In 2009 Mr Essack decided to leave Ignition and a compromise agreement provided for the payment by Ignition to Mr Essack of £200 000 as ‘compensation for loss of employment’. A concomitant letter referred to the payment being partly compensation for Mr Essack’s share entitlement which had never materialised.

The tribunal found that Mr Essack had not acquired any right to shares in Ignition adding that an unenforceable...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top