In Shinelock Ltd v HMRC [2021] UKFTT 320 (TC) (7 September) the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) dismissed the company’s appeal against a closure notice charging corporation tax on a gain on the disposal of a property where the company had immediately paid the full amount of the gain to its shareholder and director (Mr A). The FTT rejected the company’s argument that the payment resulted in a non-trading loan relationship deficit which could be set off against the gain.
The company had bought the property using funding provided partly by a bank and partly by Mr A. By the time of the hearing HMRC accepted that there was a verbal agreement under which the company would pay the gain on the sale of the property to Mr A.
The company originally argued that the gain itself actually accrued to Mr A rather...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Shinelock Ltd v HMRC [2021] UKFTT 320 (TC) (7 September) the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) dismissed the company’s appeal against a closure notice charging corporation tax on a gain on the disposal of a property where the company had immediately paid the full amount of the gain to its shareholder and director (Mr A). The FTT rejected the company’s argument that the payment resulted in a non-trading loan relationship deficit which could be set off against the gain.
The company had bought the property using funding provided partly by a bank and partly by Mr A. By the time of the hearing HMRC accepted that there was a verbal agreement under which the company would pay the gain on the sale of the property to Mr A.
The company originally argued that the gain itself actually accrued to Mr A rather...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: