In HMRC v Murphy [2022] EWCA Civ 1112 the Court of Appeal overturned the Upper Tribunal’s decision that the profit received by a taxpayer under a settlement agreement was reduced by the sums that he had paid away to his legal representatives and legal expenses insurer and hence that only the net profit under the settlement agreement was brought within the scope of the charge to employment income under Part 2 of ITEPA 2003. The Court of Appeal confirmed that ‘profit’ within ITEPA 2003 s 62(2)(b) means the gross profit received by an employee and that the only deductions which can be made from that sum are those allowed under the allowable deductions listed in ITEPA 2003 s 327.
Mr Murphy had been...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In HMRC v Murphy [2022] EWCA Civ 1112 the Court of Appeal overturned the Upper Tribunal’s decision that the profit received by a taxpayer under a settlement agreement was reduced by the sums that he had paid away to his legal representatives and legal expenses insurer and hence that only the net profit under the settlement agreement was brought within the scope of the charge to employment income under Part 2 of ITEPA 2003. The Court of Appeal confirmed that ‘profit’ within ITEPA 2003 s 62(2)(b) means the gross profit received by an employee and that the only deductions which can be made from that sum are those allowed under the allowable deductions listed in ITEPA 2003 s 327.
Mr Murphy had been...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: