Non-domiciles and remittance basis of taxation: In A Alimahomed v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 432 (TC) (23 May 2024) the FTT allowed part of the taxpayer’s appeal finding that a discovery assessment in relation to the 2015/16 tax year was not valid because the issue of deliberate omission (under one limb of TMA 1970 s 29(4)) was not substantiated by HMRC. The FTT further found that it was insufficient for HMRC to simply say that the pleadings may have been over-prescribed in an attempt to depart from the original case pleaded in the absence of any application to amend the pleadings.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Non-domiciles and remittance basis of taxation: In A Alimahomed v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 432 (TC) (23 May 2024) the FTT allowed part of the taxpayer’s appeal finding that a discovery assessment in relation to the 2015/16 tax year was not valid because the issue of deliberate omission (under one limb of TMA 1970 s 29(4)) was not substantiated by HMRC. The FTT further found that it was insufficient for HMRC to simply say that the pleadings may have been over-prescribed in an attempt to depart from the original case pleaded in the absence of any application to amend the pleadings.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: