Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Private client review for June 2023

Recent cases on information notices, penalties, and what is and is not a ‘mistake’ are reviewed by Edward Reed and Andrew Crozier (Macfarlanes).

Schedule 36 information notices: a mixed bag

We have commented recently on cases challenging FA 2008 Sch 36 information notices where taxpayer success is somewhat mixed. Against the recent backdrop of the taxpayer’s win in Davies v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 369 (TC) (discussed in November) where HMRC’s request was denied on procedural grounds Leen v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 407 (TC) is a comeback for HMRC.

In Leen the FTT concluded that information relating to a taxpayer’s personal services company (PSC) was disclosable under a Sch 36 notice issued as part of an enquiry into the taxpayer as an individual.

The taxpayer was a retired doctor receiving private consultancy fees via a PSC and had initially disclosed personal bank statements; however these did...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top