We have commented recently on cases challenging FA 2008 Sch 36 information notices where taxpayer success is somewhat mixed. Against the recent backdrop of the taxpayer’s win in Davies v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 369 (TC) (discussed in November) where HMRC’s request was denied on procedural grounds Leen v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 407 (TC) is a comeback for HMRC.
In Leen the FTT concluded that information relating to a taxpayer’s personal services company (PSC) was disclosable under a Sch 36 notice issued as part of an enquiry into the taxpayer as an individual.
The taxpayer was a retired doctor receiving private consultancy fees via a PSC and had initially disclosed personal bank statements; however these did...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
We have commented recently on cases challenging FA 2008 Sch 36 information notices where taxpayer success is somewhat mixed. Against the recent backdrop of the taxpayer’s win in Davies v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 369 (TC) (discussed in November) where HMRC’s request was denied on procedural grounds Leen v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 407 (TC) is a comeback for HMRC.
In Leen the FTT concluded that information relating to a taxpayer’s personal services company (PSC) was disclosable under a Sch 36 notice issued as part of an enquiry into the taxpayer as an individual.
The taxpayer was a retired doctor receiving private consultancy fees via a PSC and had initially disclosed personal bank statements; however these did...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: