In our March column we looked at the Court of Appeal’s decision in Hyman and others v HMRC [2022] EWCA Civ 185. The findings in that case were central to the discussion in Averdieck v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 374 (TC) and the taxpayers in both cases were represented by the same counsel.
Mr and Mrs Averdieck purchased a large home set in roughly 14 acres of extensive grounds for which they paid c.£3m. The case turned on the impact of a lane running along one of the boundaries of the property which provided access to a neighbouring farm and five residential homes. ...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In our March column we looked at the Court of Appeal’s decision in Hyman and others v HMRC [2022] EWCA Civ 185. The findings in that case were central to the discussion in Averdieck v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 374 (TC) and the taxpayers in both cases were represented by the same counsel.
Mr and Mrs Averdieck purchased a large home set in roughly 14 acres of extensive grounds for which they paid c.£3m. The case turned on the impact of a lane running along one of the boundaries of the property which provided access to a neighbouring farm and five residential homes. ...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: