Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

S Hackett and another v HMRC

In S Hackett and another v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 749 (TC) (15 August) the FTT rejected the taxpayer’s assertion that compensation for misselling of interest rate hedging products was not taxable holding that it related to the profits of the property business.

Two brothers Simon and Edward Hackett ran a property rental business claiming deduction for interest paid. Interest arose from a missold hedging product for which the brothers later received compensation and interest on the compensation.

HMRC having opened an enquiry issued closure notices on the basis that the basic redress compensation receipts were taxable as income from a property business (ITTOIA 2005 s 268 271–272) and interest on the compensation was taxable as interest (ITTOIA 2005 s 369).

The brothers considered that the interest and basic redress were not taxable. They argued that the receipts represented the opportunity cost of losing the ability...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top